Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
1.
Taylor ES, Dail-Barnett H, Jennings J, Cummings DM. Bridging the Gap: How a School-Based Telehealth Program is Expanding Mental Health Access in Rural Eastern North Carolina. North Carolina Medical Journal. 2026;87(1). doi:10.18043/001c.160640
Download all (5)

Abstract

Rural youth face significant barriers to mental health care, and many go untreated. Schools provide an ideal context for service integration, and telehealth reduces access challenges. The Healthier Lives at School & Beyond (HLSB) program at East Carolina University (ECU) delivers school-based behavioral telehealth care using evidence-based, multidisciplinary interventions to support rural students.

Introduction

Digital technology has surged in popularity in recent years, with health care systems incorporating virtual connectivity and platform interoperability to strengthen access to care and promote health equity. Such efforts have been particularly true in medically underserved and rural regions, where a confluence of factors including health care and specialty provider shortages, transportation barriers, geographic limitations, disproportionate rates of disease burden and chronic illness, socioeconomic challenges, care stigmatization, and hospital closures have historically impeded quality access and timely care provision. In Eastern North Carolina, a 41-county region east of the I-95 corridor, nearly 50% of the catchment area is considered economically distressed and is, relative to other regions across the state, one of the poorest.1–3 Residents within this region encounter poorer chronic disease outcomes, experience higher mortality and morbidity rates, and frequently face long travel distances to hospital-based care and specialty services.1 When considering ways these factors impact rural youth, data is equally as stark.

In Eastern North Carolina, rural youth experience higher rates of mental health crises, obesity, and substance use, potentially elevating risk for development of a mental health disorder compared to non-rural peers.4 While more recent NC Healthy Schools Youth Risk Behavior Survey data suggest improved emotional health among North Carolina youth, many agree that the state continues to face a youth mental health crisis. In 2021, over 1 in 10 children aged 3–17 reported receiving a depression or anxiety diagnosis, and 1 in 10 high school students reported a suicide attempt.5 While need is evident, factors like mental health workforce shortages and the paucity of youth-focused treatment options, particularly in rural areas, have left 72% of youth struggling with a treatable mental health disorder without care.5,6 These challenges underscore a significant unmet need and catalyzed the development of Healthier Lives at School & Beyond (HLSB), a school-based telehealth program expanding access by delivering services where youth are most consistently present—within schools—while reducing structural barriers through virtual care. This article provides an overview of HLSB’s integrative school-based care approach and specifically explores behavioral telehealth services.

Program Overview

In 2016, during its initial planning phase, the HLSB program was designed to replicate the model of a traditional school-based health center while innovating by delivering services remotely within schools, an approach that was largely uncharted at the time. This delivery model allowed for a team of multidisciplinary health care professionals practicing within a regional academic medical center—the Brody School of Medicine (BSOM) at East Carolina University (ECU)—to provide real-time nutrition counseling, behavioral health, and acute medical services to students, faculty, and staff in rural school districts. Initially piloting in three initial schools, as shown in Figure 1, the HLSB program has since expanded to include 26 public schools (pre-K–12) across four rural Public School Units (PSUs) in Eastern North Carolina. Communities within this catchment are designated as Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas and are collectively home to over 13,300 enrolled students and 1745 employed school faculty and staff.1,7

Figure 1
Figure 1.Healthier Lives at School & Beyond Coverage Area/Active Program Sites

Figure source. Created by the authors.

In response to regional needs, the HLSB program is guided by objectives that include enhancing access to care, preventing adverse effects of chronic disease, reducing student absenteeism, and minimizing unnecessary emergency department visits. Additional goals include improving educational outcomes and supporting school faculty and staff through worksite wellness initiatives, such as virtual support circles facilitated by HLSB behavioral health providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since program inception, over 6000 telehealth encounters have been completed across all HLSB service lines, including acute medical, nutrition counseling, and behavioral telehealth services.

Multidisciplinary care

Given the magnitude and multidimensionality of HLSB program objectives, compiling a team of professionals from various health care domains is essential. Although school-based studies examining the efficacy of multidisciplinary care approaches are still emerging, broader health care research shows that multidisciplinary care teams in non-hospital and community settings improve patient-reported outcomes (such as care satisfaction and self-efficacy), enhance care coordination, and contribute to better social-emotional health.8–10 Multidisciplinary care teams, by definition, are collaborative groups of professionals representing multiple disciplines who coordinate assessment, planning, and service delivery of specific populations.8

Within the context of the HLSB program, multidisciplinary care team members include licensed mental health providers, registered dietitians, board-certified pediatricians, and advanced care providers, as well as graduate-level behavioral health and nutrition interns, medical students, and internal medicine/pediatric residents. The team works in tandem with multidisciplinary school supports at each originating site (schools), including HLSB-employed, community-based support staff and telehealth logistics coordinators (TLCs). These “boots-on-the-ground” team members assist with community outreach, provide on-demand, on-site school support, tele-present students, attend School Health Advisory Council (SHAC) meetings, and bridge communications between clinical HLSB and school support staff. Appendix A presents a full list of multidisciplinary care team members.

External community-based supports (outpatient mental health therapists, caseworkers/child protective service agencies, primary care providers/pediatricians, health department providers) and pre-existing in-school supports (co-located school-based mental health providers, other virtual school-based telehealth providers, community organizations running in-school support programming) are also incorporated into shared care planning and coordination efforts with proper consent. These approaches have contributed to:

Timely access. HLSB providers have the option of referring care to one another after a student is established with the program and co-morbidities are identified.

Shared treatment planning. HLSB providers have a shared record system and can ensure a tailored treatment approach that integrates the whole child and whole health.

Improved system-level collaboration between health care, family, and school. HLSB providers actively utilize the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) framework to inform coordinated care efforts.11

A non-HLSB-affiliated pediatrician working within a rural county served by HLSB services described their experiences with HLSB’s care approach:

“You just overcome all [the rural health] barriers in one fell swoop. And when I have a child who needs something, I know I can get the child to services. Every person that I have sent to a nutritionist or behavioral health specialist [via telemedicine] has been a success story. Their lives have been touched and changed by it, and they have been made healthier by it. And having children who are physically healthy, mentally healthy, and nutritionally healthy creates stronger communities.”

Overview: HLSB Behavioral Telehealth Services

Research suggests that schools have increased access to mental and behavioral health more than any other setting, and nearly one-third of adolescents who receive mental health services do so exclusively within an academic space.12,13 PSUs served by the HLSB program are categorized by the Health Resources and Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas (MHPSAs) and are five times less likely to have access to a qualified mental health provider.1,14 To address this need, HLSB behavioral telehealth services are designed to: 1) provide early identification and intervention support for common pediatric mental health needs/complications; 2) provide high-quality student- and family-centered behavioral telehealth services grounded in evidence-based practices; and 3) collaborate with PSUs on tailoring behavioral telehealth service integration that builds upon and compliments pre-existing student support services and frameworks, such as multi-tiered systems of supports (MTSS).

Components of Care and Workflow

Behavioral telehealth services offered within the HLSB program are designed to improve access to evidence-based pediatric mental health treatment by virtually connecting licensed mental health providers or graduate-level clinical interns to patients presenting with mild to moderate behavioral health concerns necessitating clinical intervention and support. By providing these services virtually, traditional access barriers are eliminated. Services are delivered using synchronous, real-time, HIPAA-compliant audio-video technology in a private environment within the school. The HLSB program provides tablets at each school to facilitate telehealth connections, with appointments scheduled during non-core instructional periods (e.g., encore or resource time).

To replicate the in-person therapeutic environment, schools are also supplied with items that promote warmth, safety, engagement, and self-regulation during virtual visits. These include stress balls, fidgets, textured tactile stickers, pop-it toys, finger puppets, feelings games, materials to support artistic expression and dramatic play, and a treasure chest from which patients choose a treasure at the conclusion of each appointment. Additionally, schools are provided with copies of frequently used, validated pediatric screening tools, including the Patient Health Questionnaire-Adolescent (PHQ-A), Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-17), Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED), Vanderbilt Assessment Scales, and Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS); they also have safety plan templates with local crisis resources for use at the clinician’s direction. Figure 2 presents a visual overview of the program’s referral-to-care workflow.

Figure 2
Figure 2.School-Based Behavioral Telehealth Workflow

Figure source. Created by the ECU graduate student Sarah Buckner on behalf of the authors.

Evidence-Based Practice

Behavioral telehealth services are delivered within a brief, time-limited care model (6–12 bi-weekly psychotherapy sessions, with a 30–40-minute duration) appropriate to the school setting. Interventions emphasize targeted skill development, symptom stabilization, and coordination with families, the school, and community providers when longer-term or specialized care is warranted.15 Behavioral assessment and psychotherapeutic interventions are grounded in evidence-based theoretical frameworks and theories, including brief cognitive behavioral therapy (B-CBT), solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT), motivational interviewing, problem-solving therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT), and family systems theory. Therapeutic techniques and interventions are developmentally tailored to meet the developmental, contextual, and biopsychosocial-spiritual (BPSS) needs of patients and their support systems.

Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Integration

Behavioral telehealth services are integrated within existing school-level support structures to facilitate coordinated, individualized care grounded in a whole-child framework (e.g., WSCC). In alignment with MTSS prevention and tiered service delivery principles, interventions emphasize early identification, promotion of student well-being, academic success, social-emotional functioning, and family engagement.16 Referrals for behavioral telehealth most commonly correspond to Tier 1 (universal) and Tier 2 (targeted) supports, with a smaller proportion reserved for students demonstrating Tier 3 (intensive) needs.17

Common Referral Reasons

Students are commonly referred for concerns including anxiety, depressive symptoms, adjustment-related difficulties, neurodevelopmental conditions, disruptive behavior disorders, trauma, and grief. Diagnostic patterns of students (aged 5–12 and 13–19 years old) served during the previous academic year (school year 2024–2025) largely reflected these presenting concerns, with the five most frequent diagnoses summarized in Table 1. The most frequently assigned DSM-5-TR diagnosis was Z71.9 (Other Counseling or Consultation), reflecting the program’s emphasis on early identification, brief supportive interventions, and skill-building to promote student well-being while avoiding over-pathologizing normal developmental and adjustment challenges.18 Other common diagnoses, including anxiety, depression, and adjustment-related and trauma disorders, illustrate the program’s responsiveness to a range of behavioral health needs (Table 1).

Table 1.Primary DSM-5-TR Diagnostic Classifications, Patients Aged 5–12 Years Old and Patients Aged 13–19 Years Old, 2024–2025 School Year (All School Districts)
Patients Aged 5–12 Years Old, 2024–2025 School Year (All School Districts)
Domains Count %
Other health service encounters for counseling & medical advice 26 44.1%
Anxiety disorders 9 15.3%
Trauma and stressor-related disorder 9 15.3%
Depressive disorders 6 10.2%
Neurodevelopmental disorder 5 8.5%
Other domain(s) 4 6.8%
Total patients aged 5–12 years old 59
Patients Aged 13-19 Years Old, 2024–2025 School Year (All School Districts)a
Domains Count %
Other health service encounters for counseling & medical advice 11 30.6%
Anxiety disorders 9 25.0%
Depressive disorders 8 22.2%
Trauma and stressor-related disorder 6 16.7%
Neurodevelopmental disorder 2 5.6%
Total patients aged 13–19 years old 36

Table note. Percentage totals may be greater than 100% due to rounding of individual percentages. All school districts include Duplin County Schools, Clinton City Schools (Sampson County, NC), Jones County Schools, and Bertie Middle School (Bertie County Schools).
a In the “Patients Aged 13–19 Years Old” category, two patients were excluded from totals.

Training and Education: Behavioral Telehealth Interns

Given persistent shortages in rural mental health care, a concurrent goal of the HLSB program is to train, prepare, and equip graduate behavioral health learners to meet the needs of underserved rural populations, strengthen skill in virtual pediatric telehealth practices, and help fill the rural workforce provider pipeline. Graduate interns represent disciplines from across ECU’s campus, including pediatric school psychology (PhD), clinical health psychology (PhD), clinical counseling (MS), counselor education (MS), and marriage and family therapy (MS), and make up 60%–70% of the overall HLSB behavioral health team annually. Licensed mental health clinicians, who dually serve as faculty and staff at the Brody School of Medicine, provide direct clinical supervision to graduate interns completing basic and advanced practicum requirements with the HLSB program. Since becoming an official clinical internship training site in 2020, HLSB has trained over 30 ECU graduate students, with 99% indicating a satisfactory or extremely satisfactory clinical experience.

Conclusion and Reflections

Delivering behavioral telehealth services in rural school settings maximizes reach, minimizes barriers, and ensures that interventions occur in a familiar, supportive, and collaborative environment. Programs like HLSB have potential to serve as a replicable program model as state-wide youth mental health initiatives move toward advancing school-based behavioral health programming and infrastructure. For example, state legislation passed in 2020 (SB 476) sought to enhance mental health support available in K-12 schools; in 2023, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in partnership with the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, developed a state-wide School-Behavioral Health Action Plan including investment proposals supporting school-based telehealth pilot programs.19,20

As the integration of telehealth and school-based health care continues, there is also a need for interconnected research, policy, and practice agendas on state, regional, and local levels. Groups like the Collaborative for the Advancement of School Telehealth are aiding these efforts, creating a consortium of school-based telehealth programs from across the Carolinas, Georgia, and Virginia where shared learning, research, and program sustainability planning can convene.21 No matter what the next direction of school-based telehealth services is, one thing is certain: for as long as it can, HLSB will continue to bridge barriers and support rural youth one telehealth connection at a time.


Acknowledgments

Our sincerest thanks to Sarah Maness, PhD, MPH, Department of Health Education and Promotion at East Carolina University, for additional editorial assistance and review.

The Institutional Review Board at East Carolina University has reviewed all data collection protocols utilized for purposes of this article and provided IRB approval (IRB: UMCIRB 25-001825). All data presented were fully de-identified prior to investigator access.

Financial support

The Healthier Lives at School and Beyond Telemedicine Program has received generous funding from the following sources: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office for Advancement of Telehealth; Anonymous Trust; The Harold H. Bate Foundation; Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation; United Healthcare; North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS); ECU Health Foundation; and North Carolina Blue Cross Blue Shield.

Disclosure of interests

The author and program affiliates have no relevant disclosures to report.

Correspondence

Address correspondence to Erika Taylor, 101 Heart Dr. Mail Stop 654 Greenville, NC 27834 (taylorer17@ecu.edu).

References

1.
Analytics and Innovations Program. HPSA designation and provider distribution in North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Office of Rural Health. Accessed March 1, 2026. https:/​/​www.ncdhhs.gov/​divisions/​office-rural-health/​office-rural-health-programs/​analytics-and-innovations-program
2.
America’s Health Rankings. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; National Plan and Provider Enumeration System; United Health Foundation. September 2025. Accessed February 2026. https:/​/​americashealthrankings.org
3.
County Health Rankings & Roadmaps. North Carolina health rankings. University of Wisconsin-Madison Population Health Institute. 2024. Accessed February 2026. https:/​/​www.countyhealthrankings.org/​health-data/​north-carolina?year=2024
4.
Maseman C. Lack of Access to Mental Health Care Among North Carolina’s Rural Youth. Writing in Health and Medicine—Fall 2023: Sections 005 and 019. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. November 6, 2023. Accessed February 2026. https:/​/​tarheels.live/​writinginhealthandmedicinefall2023/​2023/​11/​06/​lack-of-access-to-mental-health-care-among-north-carolinas-rural-youth/​
5.
National Institute of Medicine. 2023 County Data Cards. NC Child. March 26, 2024. Accessed February 2026. https:/​/​ncchild.org/​what-we-do/​insights/​data/​county-data-dashboard/​
6.
Whitney DG, Peterson MD. US national and state-level prevalence of mental health disorders and disparities of mental health care use in children. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(4):389-391. doi:10.1001/​jamapediatrics.2018.5399
Google Scholar
7.
County distress rankings (tiers). North Carolina Department of Commerce. December 2025. Accessed March 1, 2026. https:/​/​www.commerce.nc.gov/​grants-incentives/​county-distress-rankings-tiers
8.
Shi Y, Li H, Yuan B, Wang X. Effects of multidisciplinary teamwork in non-hospital settings on healthcare and patients with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Prim Care. 2025;26(1):110. doi:10.1186/​s12875-025-02814-0
Google Scholar
9.
Lyon AR, Whitaker K, Richardson LP, French WP, McCauley E. Collaborative care to improve access and quality in school-based behavioral health. J Sch Health. 2019;89(12):1013-1023. doi:10.1111/​josh.12843
Google Scholar
10.
Zhu D, Paige SR, Slone H, et al. Exploring telemental health practice before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. J Telemed Telecare. 2024;30(1):72-78. doi:10.1177/​1357633X211025943
Google Scholar
11.
Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. June 26, 2024. Accessed February 28, 2026. https:/​/​www.cdc.gov/​whole-school-community-child/​about/​index.html
12.
Ali MM, West K, Teich JL, Lynch S, Mutter R, Dubenitz J. Utilization of mental health services in educational settings by adolescents in the United States. J Sch Health. 2019;89(5):393-401. doi:10.1111/​josh.12753
Google Scholar
13.
Farmer EMZ, Burns BJ, Phillips SD, Angold A, Costello EJ. Pathways into and through mental health services for children and adolescents. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54(1):60-66. doi:10.1176/​appi.ps.54.1.60
Google Scholar
14.
Fox K, Burgess A, Williamson ME, et al. Implementation of telehealth services in rural schools: A qualitative assessment. J Sch Health. 2022;92(1):71-78. doi:10.1111/​josh.13104
Google Scholar
15.
Taylor E, Jennings J, Dail-Barnett H, Cummings S. An integrated care approach to addressing unmet behavioral health needs of school aged children in rural public-school units. Presented at: National School Mental Health Annual Conference; December 4, 2024; Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
16.
McIntosh K, Goodman S. Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Guilford Press; 2016.
Google Scholar
17.
Sugai G, Horner RH. Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality. 2009;17(4):223-237. doi:10.1080/​09362830903235375
Google Scholar
18.
Association AP, American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5-TR. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2022. doi:10.1176/​appi.books.9780890425787
Google Scholar
19.
Department of Public Instruction. Report to the North Carolina General Assembly: SchoolBased Mental Health Plans and Compliance Report: Session Law 2020-7/Senate Bill 476. North Carolina State Board of Education; 2023. Accessed February 2026. https:/​/​webservices.ncleg.gov/​ViewDocSiteFile/​82094
20.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. North Carolina Unified School Behavioral Health Action Plan. March 27, 2023. Accessed February 2026. https:/​/​www.ncdhhs.gov/​unified-school-behavioral-health-action-plan/​open
21.
School-based telehealth. Collaborative for the Advancement of School Telehealth (CAST). Accessed March 9, 2026. https:/​/​schooltelehealthcollaborative.org/​

Appendix A. Multidisciplinary Care Team Composition

Figure source. Created by the authors.